First useful observation
2:00
The evaluator has named a specific strength and connected it to the speaker’s effect. Move toward one improvement rather than opening a second review.
Free timer · no account · works offline
Rehearse specific feedback and a useful next step
Space start / pauseF fullscreenM muteR reset
Evidence-first evaluator rehearsal
A useful evaluation is not a list of compliments or corrections. It shows the speaker what worked, what to try next, and why that change matters. Use the timer above to rehearse the complete feedback arc while keeping your observations specific.
Make the clock protect usefulness
Use the colors as feedback decisions. Green protects the evidence, yellow protects the recommendation, and red protects the close.
First useful observation
2:00
The evaluator has named a specific strength and connected it to the speaker’s effect. Move toward one improvement rather than opening a second review.
Improvement checkpoint
2:30
Make the recommendation actionable. Give the speaker an example, replacement, or next rehearsal choice they can use immediately.
Close checkpoint
3:00
Land the evaluation’s main takeaway and encouragement. These are practical rehearsal cues; the club or contest chair controls official signals.
Contest practice boundary
3:30
The current Speech Contest Rulebook uses a whole-second 3:30 disqualification boundary for Evaluation Contest speeches. Confirm the current briefing before competing.
Evaluate the speech that happened
Keep the evaluator’s job distinct from rewriting the speech. Listen for the speaker’s purpose, then give one repeatable strength, one high-leverage improvement, and one next action.
Step 1
Write down the speaker’s purpose, audience, and intended takeaway before deciding what to praise or change. Evaluate the speech that was given, not the speech you would have written.
Step 2
Point to a moment, choice, or effect. Explain why it helped the audience so the speaker can repeat the behavior in a future speech.
Step 3
Choose the change with the highest leverage. Describe what to try, where to try it, and what the audience should notice next time.
Step 4
Recap the strength and recommendation in a sentence the speaker can remember. Encouragement is more useful when it points toward a real rehearsal choice.
A compact feedback shape
This structure is a rehearsal aid for a club evaluation or contest practice. Adjust it for the speech, assignment, and meeting brief; do not force every observation into the same script.
State the speech’s purpose or the focus you are evaluating. A clear frame keeps the feedback fair and prevents a review of every possible criterion.
Use a concrete moment and explain its audience effect. “Good energy” is a starting impression; “the pause before the final example made the contrast clear” is usable evidence.
Name the change, show where it belongs, and explain what it would improve. Keep the recommendation within the speaker’s purpose and available practice time.
Offer a wording, movement, structure, or rehearsal experiment. An evaluator is a coach for the next run, not a judge handing down a general verdict.
Connect the recommendation to the strength you observed and close with a clear next action. Leave the speaker with direction, not a pile of disconnected notes.
Evaluator decisions
Point to the moment, wording, movement, or audience effect that supports your observation. Specific evidence lets the speaker repeat or change a behavior.
Choose the improvement that would help the most. Give a practical experiment rather than a general label such as “be more confident.”
Return to the speech’s purpose and connect the recommendation to it. The speaker should leave knowing what to try in the next rehearsal.
Before the next evaluation
Take notes while listening, then use the timer for one complete evaluation. Cut a second improvement before you rush the recommendation or close.
Choose a matching workflow
Rehearse the separate five-to-seven-minute test speech and supervised handoff.
Use a longer preparation checklist when you need criteria before the timed run.
Capture structured notes without putting speech text or personal details into the timer.
Answers for speech evaluators
A club evaluation may use the meeting’s assigned role or club practice. There is no universal club duration. The current Toastmasters Speech Contest Rulebook specifies two to three minutes for Evaluation Contest speeches; confirm the current event briefing.
This page uses them as practical rehearsal cues. Official signals and procedures are controlled by the contest chair, club, or meeting team. The current rulebook provides the Evaluation Contest speech window and whole-second boundaries, not a universal signal scheme for every meeting.
Start with the speech’s purpose, name one specific strength and its effect, give one actionable improvement with an example, and close with an encouraging next step. Adjust the balance to the speaker and assignment.
One well-supported strength and one high-leverage improvement are often more useful than a long list. Add another point only when the timing and assignment make it possible to explain what the speaker should do next.
Yes, as an independent rehearsal aid. The current contest sequence also includes a five-to-seven-minute test speech and five minutes of supervised preparation; use the separate Test Speech Timer and official rulebook for that procedure.
Follow the current rulebook and Sergeant at Arms instructions. The rulebook describes an official notes sheet and prohibits digital or other devices used to gain an unfair advantage during the contest.
No. SpeechTimer measures a run in your browser and does not request or upload speech text, evaluator notes, speaker names, recordings, club details, or judging results.