Pass 1 · capture
Listen for the test speech’s purpose, strongest moment, and one change that would help the speaker. Use the preparation period exactly as your briefing allows.
Rehearse a specific 2–3-minute evaluation after a supervised test speech: identify a strength, explain its effect, and offer one usable next action.
Public reference window: 2–3 minutes. Confirm the current year and local briefing before a contest.
Use these as preparation prompts, not as a replacement for the current rulebook, official forms, or the contest chair’s instructions.
Run the full attempt, edit one decision at a time, and then rehearse the actual contest brief. The timer supports elapsed-time practice; it does not store the speech, evaluation, or contest result.
Listen for the test speech’s purpose, strongest moment, and one change that would help the speaker. Use the preparation period exactly as your briefing allows.
Choose two or three high-value observations instead of listing every note. Connect each suggestion to a moment the speaker can recognize.
Practice a clear opening, evidence-based commendation, specific recommendation, and encouraging close while protecting the red boundary.
The contest’s preparation period is part of the official procedure. Use this sequence for independent practice, then follow the exact contest-chair briefing for the live event.
Evaluate the speech you observed, not the person. Describe an observable moment, explain its audience effect, and offer one next experiment tied to the speaker’s message. Keep member numbers, private stories, health information, and confidential notes out of shared practice copies.
Toastmasters contests can advance through club, area, division, district, regional, and world-championship stages depending on the contest and season. Confirm the active path, dates, and advancement instructions with your district and the current official program rather than relying on a separate page for each level.
The public contest reference uses a 2–3-minute evaluation window and a separate supervised preparation sequence. Confirm the current rulebook, test-speech instructions, and contest chair briefing.
Choose specific moments from the speech, explain why they helped or limited the audience, and give a realistic next action. A useful evaluation is evidence-based rather than a list of personal preferences.
No. Use the Test Speech Timer for a separate test-speech rehearsal and follow the official preparation, notes, and judging procedure. This page only supports independent evaluation practice.
The evaluator receives or observes a test speech and follows the current supervised preparation sequence. The contest chair and current rulebook control the permitted materials, preparation time, and procedure.
Prioritize the few observations that best serve the test speech’s objective. One specific strength, one evidence-based recommendation, and a clear close are usually more useful than a transcript or a long list of preferences.
No. Use the current official judging criteria, ballot, evaluation resource, contest briefing, and rulebook. SpeechTimer provides an independent rehearsal aid and does not submit or score a contest evaluation.